The doctor in claims for work injuries and ill health--legal pitfalls.
- Author:
See-Muah LEE
1
;
Judy SNG
;
David KOH
Author Information
1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. ephlsm@nus.edu.sg
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Accidents, Occupational;
legislation & jurisprudence;
Asthma;
Humans;
Liability, Legal;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Occupational Exposure;
Occupational Health;
legislation & jurisprudence;
Risk Assessment;
Singapore;
Workers' Compensation;
legislation & jurisprudence
- From:Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
2009;38(8):727-732
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Occupational health work is currently undertaken by the specialist and the non-specialist physician alike. The work scope can vary from medical assessments of individual workers to health risk assessment at the workplace. The scope of the latter will include evaluation of exposures, hazards, risks and its management to control these risks. Much of the case law governing legal disputes over industrial safety and health have involved the employers. Over the years, the actions brought forth by workers have resulted in a formidable volume of case law based on statutes and on the common law of negligence in tort. Disputes over the assessment of workers' health or workplace health risks to the extent that it is a failure to discharge a reasonable standard of care, may result in the doctor being a defendant. Measures to prevent these legal pitfalls include communication with employers about the causative link of the illness suffered to workplace factors and the clarity of contractual obligations undertaken with regard to workplace health risk assessment.
