Comparison of Multislice Spiral CT Dual Phase and Somatosatatin Receptor Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Pancreas Neuroendocrine Tumors.
10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2016.03.012
- Author:
Hui WANG
1
;
Ping LI
2
;
Wei-dong PAN
2
;
Hua-dan XUE
2
Author Information
1. 1Department of Radiology,the People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830000,China
2. 2Department of Radiology,PUMC Hospital,CAMS and PUMC,Beijing 100730,China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Humans;
Neuroendocrine Tumors;
diagnostic imaging;
Pancreatic Neoplasms;
diagnostic imaging;
Radionuclide Imaging;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Tomography, Spiral Computed
- From:
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
2016;38(3):312-317
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the sensitivity of multislice spiral CT dual phase and somatosatatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in the diagnosis of pancreas nuroendocrine tumors (pNET). Methods Totally 28 patients with pathologically confirmed pNET recieved both CT dual phase contrast and SRS and the results were compared. Results Of these 28 pNET patients,26 (92.8%) were accurately diagnosed by CT dual-phase scan and 20 (71.4%) by SRS (P＝0.031).In the functioning pNET cases,the diagnosis sensitivity of CT dual phase scan and SRS was 94.1% (16/17)and 58.8% (10/17)(P＝0.218). In the non-functioning pNET cases,the sensitivity was 90.9% (10/11) and 90.9% (10/11) (P＝0.740).Diagnostic sensitivity of CT dual phase scan and SRS for pNET without metastasis was 90.4% (19/21) and 57.1% (12/21) (P＝0.125).The sensitivity for pNET with metastasis was 100%(7/7)and 100% (7/7). Corresponding to the pathological grading,the diagnostic sensitivity of CT dual phase scanning and SRS was 84.6% (11/13) and 53.8% (7/13) for G1,100% (12/12) and 83.3% (10/12) for G2,and 100% (3/3) and 100% (3/3) for G3. The diagnostic sensitivity of CT dual phase scan and SRS for pNET with diameter less than or equal to 2.0 cm was 94.7% (18/19) and 52.6% (10/19) (P＝0.008). For pNET with diameter more than 2.0 cm,the sensitivity was 92.8% (13/14) and 100% (14/14). Conclusions Compared with SRS,dual phase CT scan is more sensitive in diagnosing pNET,especially for those in lower pathological stages. For lesions sized less than or equal to 2.0 cm,SRS should be combined with other imaging examinations to minimize false negative results.
