Efficacy comparison between Ph⁺ ALL patients treated with chemotherapyplus tyrosine kinase inhibitors followed by allo-HSCT and Ph-ALL patients with allo-HSCT: a case control study from a single center.
- Author:
Jian HU
1
;
Lihong WANG
1
;
Yuan LI
1
;
Zhixiang QIU
1
;
Weilin XU
1
;
Yuhua SUN
1
;
Yue YIN
1
;
Wei LIU
1
;
Jinping OU
1
;
Mangu WANG
1
;
Wensheng WANG
1
;
Zeyin LIANG
1
;
Xinan CEN
1
;
Hanyun REN
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Disease-Free Survival; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; drug therapy; therapy; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; antagonists & inhibitors; Retrospective Studies
- From: Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015;36(7):593-597
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of the Ph⁺ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)patients treated with combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI)and chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and Ph⁻ ALL patients with allo-HSCT.
METHODSA total of 19 Ph⁺ALL patients were matched with 19 Ph⁻ALL patients from 55 B-ALL patients receiving allo-HSCT in our hospital between January 2003 and August 2014 and were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTSGender, median age, number of patients with blood white count more than 30 × 10⁹/L, number of patients with meningeal leukemia, disease status before allo-HSCT, period of allo-HSCT, the source of stem cell from donors, HLA disparities between donor and recipient, conditioning regimens and number of infused mononuclear cells and CD34⁺ cells were comparable between two groups of Ph⁺ and 19 Ph⁻ALL patients. The median time of engraftment of neutrophil cells was 12 days versus 13 days (P= 0.284) and that of platelet 14 days versus 17 days (P=0.246), which were comparable between two groups. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) in Ph⁺ and Ph⁻ALL groups was (67.5 ± 12.4)% versus (74.3 ± 11.4)% (P=0.434) and 3-year disease free survival (DFS)was (67.8 ± 12.4)% versus (74.3 ± 11.4)% (P= 0.456), respectively. The cumulative incidence of degree Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD)in Ph⁺ and Ph⁻ ALL group was (15.8±8.4)% versus (21.1 ± 9.4)% (P=0.665)and that of degree Ⅲ-Ⅳ aGVHD was (5.6 ± 5.4)% versus (11.5 ± 7.6)% (P=0.541), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was (44.1 ± 14.0)% in Ph⁺ALL group versus (44.1 ± 13.0)% in Ph⁻ALL group (P=0.835) and that of extensive cGVHD was (13.1 ± 8.7)% versus (6.2 ± 6.1)% (P=0.379), respectively. The cumulative relapse rate and the cumulative non-relapse rate in both group also have no statistical difference [(10.8 ± 7.2)% versus (20.0 ± 10.7)% (P=0.957) and (23.9 ± 12.4)% versus (7.1±6.9)% (P=0.224), respectively].
CONCLUSIONThe efficacy of Ph⁺ALL treated with combination of chemotherapy and TKIs and followed by allo-HSCT is comparable to that of Ph⁻ALL with allo-HSCT.