Effects of three at-home bleaching agents on enamel structure and structure-related mechanical properties.
- VernacularTitle:三种家用牙齿漂白剂对牙釉质结构及其相关力学性能的影响
- Author:
Yue SA
1
;
Tao JIANG
;
Bi-ying LI
;
Zhe-jun WANG
;
Zhi-hui WANG
;
Yi-ning WANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Dental Enamel; drug effects; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hardness; drug effects; Humans; Microscopy, Atomic Force; Peroxides; administration & dosage; pharmacology; Random Allocation; Spectrophotometry, Infrared; Spectrum Analysis, Raman; Surface Properties; Tooth Bleaching; Tooth Bleaching Agents; administration & dosage; pharmacology; Tooth Demineralization; chemically induced; Urea; administration & dosage; analogs & derivatives; pharmacology
- From: Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2012;47(5):281-286
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate the effects of three differently concentrated at-home bleaching agents on the structure and the structure-related mechanical properties of human enamel.
METHODSSixty enamel specimens were randomly divided into four groups and treated with 10% carbamide peroxide (CP), 15% CP, 20% CP and distilled water, respectively. The bleaching process was 8 h/day for 14 consecutive days. Baseline and final atomic force microscopy (AFM) surface detection, Raman spectroscopy, attenuated total reflectance-infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR), microhardness and fracture toughness (FT) measurements were carried out before and after bleaching experiments.
RESULTSCP didn't change the morphology of enamel. Meanwhile, the three bleached groups and the control group had no significant difference in root mean square detection (P = 0.774), ν(2)CO(3)(2-) : ν(1)ν(3)PO(4)(3-) (P = 0.263) and microhardness (P = 0.829). The percentage of relative Raman intensity in the three bleached groups and the control group were (105.74 ± 11.34)%, (104.46 ± 8.83)%, (99.52 ± 9.32)% and (97.62 ± 7.46)%, respectively. There was no significant difference among them (P = 0.062). However, the percentage of laser-induced fluorescence in the three bleached groups and the control group were (20.86 ± 7.23)%, (22.14 ± 7.34)%, (21.10 ± 7.59)% and (100.78 ± 3.70)%, respectively. There was significant difference between either of the bleached groups and the control group (P < 0.001). Moreover, FT declined significantly in the three groups (P = 0.024, P = 0.005, P = 0.013) when compared with the control group.
CONCLUSIONSUnder in vitro condition, three differently concentrated at-home bleaching agents wouldn't induce the demineralization and the decline of microhardness on enamel. However, the decrease of FT on enamel seemed to be inevitable after bleaching.