Cryptosporidium Oocyst Detection in Water Samples: Floatation Technique Enhanced with Immunofluorescence Is as Effective as Immunomagnetic Separation Method.
10.3347/kjp.2009.47.4.353
- Author:
Khuanchai KOOMPAPONG
1
;
Chantira SUTTHIKORNCHAI
;
Yowalark SUKTHANA
Author Information
1. Department of Protozoology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. tmymv@mahidol.ac.th
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Comparative Study ; Evaluation Studies ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Cryptosporidium;
oocyst;
floatation technique;
immunomagnetic separation;
immunofluorescence asaay;
water
- MeSH:
Animals;
Cryptosporidium/*isolation & purification;
Fluorescent Antibody Technique/*methods;
Immunomagnetic Separation/*methods;
*Oocysts;
Parasitology/*methods;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Water/*parasitology
- From:The Korean Journal of Parasitology
2009;47(4):353-357
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Cryptosporidium can cause gastrointestinal diseases worldwide, consequently posing public health problems and economic burden. Effective techniques for detecting contaminated oocysts in water are important to prevent and control the contamination. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method has been widely employed recently due to its efficiency, but, it is costly. Sucrose floatation technique is generally used for separating organisms by using their different specific gravity. It is effective and cheap but time consuming as well as requiring highly skilled personnel. Water turbidity and parasite load in water sample are additional factors affecting to the recovery rate of those 2 methods. We compared the efficiency of IMS and sucrose floatation methods to recover the spiked Cryptosporidium oocysts in various turbidity water samples. Cryptosporidium oocysts concentration at 1, 10(1), 10(2), and 10(3) per 10 microliter were spiked into 3 sets of 10 ml-water turbidity (5, 50, and 500 NTU). The recovery rate of the 2 methods was not different. Oocyst load at the concentration < 10(2) per 10 ml yielded unreliable results. Water turbidity at 500 NTU decreased the recovery rate of both techniques. The combination of sucrose floatation and immunofluorescense assay techniques (SF-FA) showed higher recovery rate than IMS and immunofluorescense assay (IMS-FA). We used this SF-FA to detect Cryptosporidium and Giardia from the river water samples and found 9 and 19 out of 30 (30% and 63.3%) positive, respectively. Our results favored sucrose floatation technique enhanced with immunofluorescense assay for detecting contaminated protozoa in water samples in general laboratories and in the real practical setting.
