Anatomic comparison of transarticular screws with lateral mass screws in cervical vertebrae.
- Author:
Guan-yi LIU
1
;
Rong-ming XU
;
Wei-hu MA
;
Yong-ping RUAN
;
Shao-hua SUN
;
Lei HUANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Bone Screws; Cervical Vertebrae; injuries; Female; Fracture Fixation, Internal; instrumentation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fractures; surgery
- From: Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2007;10(2):67-71
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo compare the potential incidence of nerve root (ventral and dorsal ramus) injury caused by cervical transarticular screws and Roy-Camille lateral mass screws.
METHODSInsertion techniques with Klekamp transarticular screws and Roy-Camille lateral mass screws were respectively performed in this study. Each technique involved four specimens and 40 screws, which were inserted from C(3) to C(7). And 20-mm-long screws were used to overpenetrate the ventral cortex. The anterolateral aspect of the cervical spine was carefully dissected to allow observation of the screw-ramus relationship.
RESULTSThe overall percentage of nerve invasion was significantly lower with Klekamp (45%) technique than with Roy-Camille (85%) technique (P less than 0.05). The largest percentage of nerve invasion for Klekamp transarticular screws was found at the dorsal ramus (25%), followed by the ventral ramus (15%) and the bifurcation of the ventral dorsal ramus (5%). The largest percentage of nerve invasion for Roy-Camille lateral mass screws was found at the ventral ramus (80%).
CONCLUSIONThe potential risk of nerve root invasion is lower with Klekamp transarticular screws than with Roy-Camille lateral mass screws.