Efficacy of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin and Recombinant Human Interleukin 11 for Treatment of Chemotherapy Indu-ced Thrombocytopenia in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients.
- Author:
Guang TANG
1
;
Xiao-Min WANG
2
;
Jun-Xia MENG
3
;
Chun-Lai LUAN
1
;
Jie-Fu CHEN
1
;
Yong-Qiang WU
1
;
Xiao-Nan ZHANG
1
;
Zi-Yan HE
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From: Journal of Experimental Hematology 2018;26(1):234-238
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of recombinant human thrombopoietin(rhTPO) and recombinant human interleukin11(rhIL-11) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in adult acute myeloid leukaemia patients.
METHODSTotal of 96 adult acute myeloid leukaemia patients were divided into 3 groups according to randomized controlled method: rhTPO group, rhIL-11 group and control group, 32 cases in each group. The patients in rhTPO group and rhIL-11 received rhTPO of 15000 IU/d and rhIL-11 of 1.5 mg/d, respectively after the standard combined chemotherapy within 24 hours, and patients in control group, received nothing drugs to promote thrombocyte recovery. And rhTPO and rhIL-11 should be stopped when the Plt≥100× 10/L. After chemotherapy, the platelet recovery degree, duration of Plt<50× 10/L, ≥50× 10/L and ≥100× 10/L, the count of infusion thrombocytes, and incidence of adverse reactions all were compared.
RESULTSThe duration of Plt<50× 10/L was obviously less than that in control group(P<0.01). The duration of rhIL-11 was less than that in control group, but there was no statistical significance(P>0.05). As compared with that in control group, the Plt count in rhTPO and rhIL-11 groups can faster increase to Plt≥50× 10/L (P<0.01, P<0.05), among them the Plt count in rhTPO group faster increase, but there was no statistical signiticance. As compared with that in control group, the Plt count in rhTPO group and rhIL-11 group can increase to Plt≥100× 10/L (P<0.01), the Plt count in rhTPO group was more obviously increase than that in rhIL-11 group(P<0.05). The count of infusion Plt in rhTPO and rhIL-11 groups was lese than that in control group(P<0.01, P<0.05), and the count of infusion Plt in rhTPO group was less than that in rhIL-11 group(P<0.05). After using rhTPO and rhIL-11, the adverse reactions, such as low fever, induration of injection site, athralgia, nausea and vomiting occured in rhTPO group and rhIL-11 group, but all can be tolerated.
CONCLUSIONBoth rhTPO and rhIL-11 can reduce the duration of thrombocytopenia and the amount of infused thrombocyte, promote platelet recovery in the patients with acute myeloid leukaemia after chemotherapy, to decreae the risk of bleeding, and reduce incidence of adverse reactions, both of them can be tolerated by patients, and rhTPO is more advantage than rhIL-11, worthy of clinical popularization and application.