OBJECTIVETo observe the effects of hemofiltration at early stage of septic shock with different ultrafiltration doses, including hemodynamics, oxygen metabolism, inflammatory mediator in piglet models, and to evaluate the therapeutic effects of HVHF.

METHODThe 18 healthy young piglets (Shanghai species) were divided randomly into three groups:control group (n = 6), conventional volume hemofiltration (CVVH) group [n = 6, ultrafiltration volume = 30 ml/(kg·h)] and high volume hemofiltration (HVHF) group [n = 6, ultrafiltration volume = 50 ml/(kg·h)], the animal model of septic shock was established by injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (150 µg/kg) O111: B4. During the experiment, the following observations were carried out for all groups:1) Changes of hemodynamics [heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MABP), cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV)] and oxygen metabolism [oxygen delivery (DO2), oxygen consumption (VO2), oxygen extraction rate (O2ER) ] at the time of B0h, 0 h, 2 h, 4 h and 6 h.2) changes of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10 in plasma at different time points (B0h, 0 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h).

RESULTSignificant difference in circulatory parameters, inflammatory mediators in plasma were found at B0h and 0 h among three groups; the CO in two treatment groups were higher than that in control group at 4 h, 6 h after model establishment (P < 0.05), and SVRI in HVHF groups were higher than that in other two groups at 4 h, 6 h after model was established (P < 0.05). The MABP in HVHF group [4 h (82 ± 17) mm Hg, 6 h (80 ± 12) mm Hg](1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) were higher than that in CVVH group at 4 h [(67 ± 12) mm Hg], 6 h [(69 ± 14) mm Hg] after model was established (P < 0.05). The levels of IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α in two treatment groups were lower than that in control group at 4 h and 6 h after model was established (P < 0.05), and the IL-6 [(281 ± 51) pg/ml], TNF-α [(67 ± 13) pg/ml] level in HVHF group was lower than that in CVVH group [IL-6(281 ± 51) pg/ml, TNF-α (67 ± 13) pg/ml] at 6 h (P < 0.05). The DO2 and VO2 in two treatment groups were higher than that in control group at 4 h, 6 h (P < 0.05), the O2ER in HVHF group were higher than that in CVVH group at 4 h (44% ± 3% vs. 33% ± 4%), 6 h (43% ± 5% vs. 31% ± 3%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONHigh volume hemofiltration (HVHF) at early stage of septic shock piglet models was more effective in improving hemodynamics, oxygen metabolism than conventional CVVH. And HVHF eliminated blood inflammatory mediators more effectively than conventional CVVH.