Is Carotid Artery Ultrasound Still Useful Method for Evaluation of Atherosclerosis?.
- Author:
Gee Hee KIM
1
;
Ho Joong YOUN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Carotid artery; Carotid atherosclerosis; Carotid artery plaque
- MeSH: Aging; Atherosclerosis*; Blood Flow Velocity; Carotid Arteries*; Carotid Artery Diseases; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Carotid Stenosis; Classification; Heart; Hemodynamics; Hypertension; Methods*; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ultrasonography*
- From:Korean Circulation Journal 2017;47(1):1-8
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Carotid ultrasound is an imaging modality that allows non-invasive assessment of vascular anatomy and function. Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) has been shown to predict cardiovascular (CV) risk in multiple large studies. However, in 2013, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines designated that the carotid IMT as class III evidence level was not recommended for use in clinical practice as a routine measurement of risk assessment for a first atherosclerotic CV event. Following the announcement of this guideline, combined common carotid IMT and plaque, including plaque tissue characterization and plaque burden, using 3D ultrasound was reported to be better than either measurement alone in a variety of studies. Moreover, changes in the intima thickness were related to aging and early atherosclerosis, and remodeling of the media thickness was associated with hypertension. Separate measurement is useful for evaluating the effects of different atherosclerotic risk factors on the arterial wall; however, a more detailed and elaborate technique needs to be developed. If so, separate measurement will play an important role in the assessment of atherosclerosis and arterial wall change according to a variety of risk factors, such as metabolic syndrome. In addition, although carotid blood flow velocity is a useful tool for risk classification and prediction in clinical practice, further clinical research is needed. The value of carotid IMT by ultrasound examination for risk stratification remains controversial, and groups developing future guidelines should consider the roles of plaque presence and burden and hemodynamic parameters in additional risk stratification beyond carotid IMT in clinical practice.
