OBJECTIVETo investigate the value of protective stoma in intersphincteric resection (ISR) for ultra-low rectal cancer.

METHODSClinical data of 56 ultra-low rectal cancer patients without involvement of external anal sphincter treated during January 1999 to July 2009 with trans-anal ISR plus trans-abdominal total mesorectum excision and coloanal anastomosis were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received protective ostomy: ostomy group (16 cases) and ostomy-free group (40 cases). The postoperative complications as well as anal functional restoration were compared between the two groups.

RESULTSSixteen cases (32.1%) of the 56 patients received protective stoma. The complication rate of anastomosis and anus complication rate in the ostomy-free group were significantly higher than those in ostomy group [35.0% (14/40) and 40.0% (16/40) vs. 1/16 and 1/16; P < 0.05]. In the ostomy-free group, one patient developed anastomotic dehiscence and tumor recurrence, the patients was given permanent colostomy, and the other three patients with lesions in the anastomosis and anus received ostomy and secondary surgical treatment, with a reoperation rate of 10.0% (4/40). The anal function of patients in the two groups were both decreased after the operation. The rate of patients got Kirwan grade I anal sphincter function in the 3rd, 6th and 12th month after protective stoma operation was 11/16, 13/15 and 11/13 in the ostomy group, respectively; and those were 30.0%, 37.5% and 45.0% in the ostomy-free group, respectively. Anal function was significantly better in the ostomy group than that in the ostomy-free group during the same postoperative period (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONProtective stoma can avoid anastomotic leakage following ISR for ultra-low rectal cancer, and alleviate the suffering of anal incontinence in the early postoperative period, and is conducive to the restoration of anal function.