The Efficiency of Simultaneous Binaural Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: A Comparative Study with Monaural Acoustic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects.
- Author:
Min Beom KIM
1
;
Jae Ho BAN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords: Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials; Reproducibility of results; Vestibular function tests; Saccule and utricle; Human
- MeSH: Acoustic Stimulation; Acoustics; Ear; Ear Diseases; Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Saccule and Utricle; Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials; Vestibular Function Tests
- From:Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2012;5(4):188-193
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the test-retest reliability and convenience of simultaneous binaural acoustic-evoked ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP). METHODS: Thirteen healthy subjects with no history of ear diseases participated in this study. All subjects underwent oVEMP test with both separated monaural acoustic stimulation and simultaneous binaural acoustic stimulation. For evaluating test-retest reliability, three repetitive sessions were performed in each ear for calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for both monaural and binaural tests. We analyzed data from the biphasic n1-p1 complex, such as latency of peak, inter-peak amplitude, and asymmetric ratio of amplitude in both ears. Finally, we checked the total time required to complete each test for evaluating test convenience. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in amplitude and asymmetric ratio in comparison between monaural and binaural oVEMP. However, latency was slightly delayed in binaural oVEMP. In test-retest reliability analysis, binaural oVEMP showed excellent ICC values ranging from 0.68 to 0.98 in latency, asymmetric ratio, and inter-peak amplitude. Additionally, the test time was shorter in binaural than monaural oVEMP. CONCLUSION: oVEMP elicited from binaural acoustic stimulation yields similar satisfactory results as monaural stimulation. Further, excellent test-retest reliability and shorter test time were achieved in binaural than in monaural oVEMP.
