Status analysis on child neglect of rural pupils aged 6-11 year-old in China.
- Author:
Jianping PAN
1
,
2
;
Email: JPPAN@MAIL.XJTU.EDU.CN.
;
Wuyue YANG
;
Feng JIAO
;
Yaqin ZHANG
;
Huiying ZHANG
;
Jingqi CHEN
;
Weiping XI
;
Yulin PENG
;
Guixiong GU
;
Zhaohui ZHONG
;
Rui QIN
;
Jun LI
;
Ying CHU
;
Jianping YANG
;
Le MA
;
Weiqing WANG
;
Wanliang WU
;
Wenjuan YANG
;
Yanhong YING
;
Yinli GAO
;
Hong TENG
;
Ting LIU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Child; Child Abuse; China; Female; Humans; Male; Physical Examination; Pupil; Risk Factors; Rural Population; Schools; Surveys and Questionnaires
- From: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2015;49(10):860-865
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo analyze pupils' neglect status aged 6-11 years in China's rural.
METHODSAccording to the principle of multi-stage stratified cluster sampling, to extract 7,943 pupils aged 6-11 years for the survey from 56 primary schools in 28 counties in nine provinces, from December 2012 to March 2013. Proceed questionnaire survey by the scale from "Neglect Evaluation Norms for pupils aged 6-8 years in Rural Areas of China" and "Neglect Evaluation Norms for pupils aged 9-11 years in Rural Areas of China". And analyze neglect rates and neglect degrees of the different grades, gender, family types and different levels of neglect.
RESULTSThe total neglect rate of China's rural pupils aged 6-8 and 9-11 years was 40.2% (1,258/3,130) and 42.5% (1,498/3,526) respectively, which differences had no statistical significant (χ2=3.59, P=0.058); the total neglect degree was 46.04±8.87 and 44.78±10.43 respectively, which differences had statistical significant (t=5.01, P<0.001); the differences of neglect rates and neglect degrees between male (41.4% (657/1,587) and 46.28±8.76) and female (39.0% (601/1,543) and 45.78±8.97) of aged 6-8 were all no statistical significant (χ2=1.87, P=0.171; t=1.49, P=0.136); the neglect rates and neglect degrees of male (46.3% (816/1,763) and 45.53±10.11) were higher than female (38.7% (682/1,763) and 44.06±10.69) in the group of aged 9-11, which differences were all statistical significant (χ2=20.84, t=3.97, P<0.001); the male neglect rate in the group of aged 6-8 in social neglect (11.7% (198/1,691)) and the neglect degree in educational neglect (48.09±9.70) were higher than female (9.4% (155/1,648) and 47.37±9.89), which differences were all statistical significance (χ2=14.55, P<0.001, t=2.22, P=0.026), the male neglect rate in the group of aged 9-11 in physical neglect (20.4% (398/1,954)) was higher than female (16.7% (326/1 957)), which differences had statistical significance (χ2=8.92, P=0.003).
CONCLUSIONThe neglect status of Chinese pupils aged 6-11 years in rural was serious, and we should find out risk factors and provide efficient prevention measures.
