OBJECTIVETo investigate the situation and the influential factors of child neglect between left-behind children and living-with-parents children aged 6-17 years in the rural areas in western China.

METHODSStudents were randomly selected according to the principle of multi-stage stratified cluster sampling and they were from three cities in Shanxi and four districts in Chongqing. Among the 4,131 children, there were 1,874 students in the 6-11 years group and the left-behind children accounted for 50.21% (941/1,874) in this group. There were 2,257 students in the 12-17 years old group and the left-behind children accounted for 53.35% (1,204/2,257) in this group. The questionnaire named "Evaluation on Neglect for Elementary and Secondary School Students Aged 6-17 Years in Rural Areas in China" was used in the field investigation. The students' neglect frequency was described by neglect rate and the factors affecting students' neglect were analyzed by means of binary logistic regression.

RESULTSIn the 6-11 years old group, the neglect rates of left-behind children and living-with-parents children were 63.03% (474/752) and 43.87% (347/791), respectively (χ2=58.86, P<0.001). In the 12-17 years old group, the neglect rates of left-behind children and living-with-parents children were 60.64% (627/1 034) and 53.57% (495/924), respectively (χ2=9.96, P<0.001). For factors influencing left-behind children, compared to the factors about boys, younger mother (≤40 years old), presence of parents' income reduction within the last year and nuclear family, the factors about girls, elder mother (41-49 years), absence of parents' income reduction within the last year and three-generation family or single-parent family were associated with lower neglect risk, and OR values were 0.67, 0.68, 0.70, 0.73, and 0.43 (P<0.05); compared to the factors about Han nationality, only child, with separate room at home, and resident children, the factors about other nationalities, non-only child, no separate room at home, and non-resident children were associated with high neglect risk, and OR values were 1.85, 1.34, 1.46, and 1.32 (P<0.05); compared to the lower father's education background (primary school or uneducated), the higher father's education background (junior middle school, senior middle school, technical secondary school, college and above) was associated with lower neglect risk, and OR values were 0.66, 0.50, and 0.25 (P<0.05); compared to good relationship between children and parents as well as good relationship between parents, fair or poor relationship was associated with high neglect risk, and OR values were 1.57-3.79 (P<0.05). For factors influencing non-left-behind children, compared to the factors about younger mother (≤40 years old), changes of patient's work in the last year, presence of parents' income reduction within the last year and nuclear family, the factors about elder mother (41-49 years), no changes of patients' work in the last year, absence of parents' income reduction within the last year and three-generation family or single-parent family were associated with lower neglect risk, and OR values were 0.69, 0.71, 0.75, 0.82, and 0.56 (P<0.05); compared to the factors about Han nationality, only child and younger father (≤40 years old), other nationalities, the factors about non-only child, and elder father (41-49 years) were associated with high neglect risk, and OR values were 1.45, 1.56, and 1.57 (P<0.05); compared to lower father's education background (primary school or uneducated), higher father's education background (junior middle school, senior middle school, technical secondary school, college and above) was associated with lower neglect risk, and OR values were 0.65 and 0.49 (P<0.05); compared to good relationship between children and parents as well as good relationship between parents, fair or poor relationship was associated with high neglect risk, and OR values were 1.56-7.69 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONThe situation of child neglect among left-behind children aged 6-17 years in rural areas of the two provinces in western China was serious, their neglect rates were higher than those of living-with-parents children, and there were many risk factors affecting the neglect rates of the two group children.