Scientific Evidence Supporting Policy Change: A Study on Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Non-smoking Areas of PC Rooms in Korea.
- Author:
Soon Yeol HONG
1
;
Min Kyung LIM
;
E Hwa YUN
;
Eun Young PARK
;
Bo Yoon JEONG
;
Wonho YANG
;
Do Hoon LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Tobacco Smoke Pollution; Personal computer room; Smoke-free policy; Air nicotine; PM2.5
- MeSH: Humans; Korea*; Microcomputers; Nicotine; Particulate Matter; Republic of Korea; Research Personnel; Smoke; Smoke-Free Policy; Smoking; Tobacco Smoke Pollution*; World Health Organization
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment 2016;48(2):834-837
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to measure secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in personal computer (PC) rooms with the purpose of determining the strength of scientific evidence supporting the legislative ban on smoking in PC rooms located in the Republic of Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June to September 2012, particulate matter (PM2.5) and air nicotine concentration (ANC) were measured in the smoking and non-smoking areas of PC rooms in Goyang City, Korea. In 28 randomly sampled PC rooms, field investigators completed an observational questionnaire on building characteristics, smoking policies, and evidence of smoking. The geometric means (GM) of PM2.5 and ANC in smoking and non-smoking areas were compared. RESULTS: Evidence of smoking was identified in both the smoking and non-smoking areas of all PC rooms. The GMs of PM2.5 and ANC in both areas were high and did not differ significantly (174.77 μg/m3 and 48.95 μg/m3 in smoking areas; 93.38 μg/m3 and 41.30 μg/m3 in non-smoking areas). Overall PM2.5 concentrations were 5.5-fold higher than those listed in the World Health Organization guidelines. CONCLUSION: This study supported previous reports that a partial smoking ban did not protect individuals from SHS exposure. Furthermore, the results from our study suggest how research can support policy. Countries in which smoke-free policies are not yet comprehensive may find our results useful.
