Differences and clinical significance of receptor expression between primary and locally recurrent breast tumor tissues.
- Author:
Xiang-min MA
1
;
Yun-wei HAN
;
Jiao ZHANG
;
Wen-jing CUI
;
Xin WANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Breast Neoplasms; metabolism; pathology; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; metabolism; pathology; Female; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; metabolism; Prognosis; Receptor, ErbB-2; metabolism; Receptors, Estrogen; metabolism; Receptors, Progesterone; metabolism; Survival Rate
- From: Chinese Journal of Oncology 2013;35(5):372-376
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo compare the difference of receptor expression between primary and locally recurrent breast tumor tissues, and analyze their impact on survival of the patients.
METHODSThe expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) of primary and locally recurrent breast tumor tissues of 70 breast cancer patients were analyzed by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization. The impact of the differences on overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) of the patients was analyzed.
RESULTSThe effective discrepancy rates between primary and locally recurrent breast cancer tissues were 26.1% (18/69) for ER, 50.0% (34/68) for PR, and 10.3%(4/39) for HER-2 expressions. In the 60 cases who had complete follow-up data, 23 patients (38.3%) died and the median overall survival was 107 months (11-288 months). The 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 84.3%, 71.6% and 45.7%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the changes of ER expression had significant impact on the OS (P = 0.001) and PRS (P < 0.001), but PR had no significant effect on OS (P = 0.416) and PRS (P = 0.056). However, the OS and PRS for patients with PR⁺ locally recurrent tumors were better than that of PR⁻ patients regardless of the primary tumor PR status. The expression of HER-2 had no significant effect on the OS (P = 0.840) and PRS (P = 0.544) of the patients.
CONCLUSIONSAn expression discrepancy of ER, PR and HER-2 exists between primary and locally recurrent breast cancer tissues, it significantly affects the survival of the patients. Re-evaluation of the expressions of ER, PR and HER-2 receptor in locally recurrent breast tumor tissue is beneficial for their therapy and prognosis.