Impact of clinicopathological features and extent of lymph node dissection on the prognosis in early gastric cancer patients.
- Author:
Hui WU
1
;
Liang WANG
;
Yu-long HE
;
Jian-bo XU
;
Shi-rong CAI
;
Jin-ping MA
;
Chuang-qi CHEN
;
Xin-hua ZHANG
;
Wen-hua ZHAN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adenocarcinoma; drug therapy; pathology; surgery; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; drug therapy; pathology; surgery; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell; drug therapy; pathology; surgery; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Fluorouracil; administration & dosage; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrectomy; methods; Humans; Leucovorin; administration & dosage; Lymph Node Excision; methods; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; drug therapy; pathology; surgery; Survival Rate
- From: Chinese Journal of Oncology 2013;35(7):509-513
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo explore the impact of clinicopathological features and extent of lymph node dissection on the prognosis in early gastric cancer (EGC) patients.
METHODSA total of 142 EGC cases screened from database of gastric cancer of Sun Yat-sen University, from Aug. 1994 to Jan. 2010, were included in this study. According to the lymph node metastasis status, they were divided into lymph node negative (n = 116) and lymph node positive (n = 26) groups. The clinicopathological features of the two groups and the impact of extent of lymph node dissection on the prognosis were analyzed.
RESULTSThere were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor size and location, Borrmann typing, WHO TNM staging, histological typing, and CEA value between the two groups (P > 0.05). The TNM stages in the lymph node positive group were higher than that in the lymph node negative group (P < 0.001). Between the cases who underwent D1 (n = 21) and D2 (n = 121) dissection, there were no significant differences in postoperative hospital days, blood transfusion volume, and operation time (P > 0.05). The median numbers of LN dissected in D1 and D2 cases were 4 (0 to 16) and 20 (12 to 30), with a significant difference (P = 0.000), but the number of positive LN without significant difference (P = 0.502). The postoperative complication rates were 9.5% in the D1 and 3.3% in the D2 dissection groups, without a significant difference (P = 0.128). The median survival time of the lymph node negative and positive groups was 156 vs. 96 months (P = 0.010). In cases who received D2 and D1 lymph node dissection, the median survival time (MST) was 156 vs. 96 months (P = 0.0022). In the lymph node positive group, D2 dissection prolonged survival time significantly than D1 dissection (96 vs. 27months) (P = 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that the extent of lymph node dissection and LN metastasis were independent prognostic factors for EGC patients.
CONCLUSIONSIt is not able to accurately assess the LN metastasis status preoperatively according to the routine clinicopathological features. For the patients with unknown LN metastasis status, D2 dissection should be the first choice. Comparing with D1 dissection, the morbidity of D2 dissection are not increased, but survival time is prolonged.