Correlation of Tp-e interval and Tp-e/Q-T ratio with malignant ventricular arrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention.
- Author:
Ting-Yan ZHU
1
;
Shu-En TENG
;
Yan-Yu CHEN
;
Shen-Rong LIU
;
Su-Rong MENG
;
Jian PENG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Death, Sudden, Cardiac; prevention & control; Defibrillators, Implantable; Electrocardiography; Heart Failure; therapy; Humans; Primary Prevention; ROC Curve; Tachycardia, Ventricular; prevention & control; Ventricular Fibrillation; Ventricular Function, Left
- From: Journal of Southern Medical University 2016;36(3):401-404
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate whether Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-e) and Tp-e/QT ratio are associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention.
METHODSA cohort of 68 consecutive patients with chronic heart failure undergoing standard ICD for primary prevention indications (NYHA function class II-III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, systolic cardiomyopathy without prior malignant ventricular arrhythmia) were enrolled in this study. The patients were followed up for 18-48 months and were divided into high-risk group and low-risk group according to the occurrence of the endpoint events of sudden cardiac death (SCD), ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic characteristics, Tp-e, and Tp-e/QT ratio were analyzed in all cases before ICD implantation.
RESULTSDuring the follow-up, ICD shock for sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation occurred in 11 patients; nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) that did not require therapy was detected by ICD in 7 patients (high-risk group, 18 cases). ICD did not detect ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in 50 patients (low-rsk group). Compared with the low-rsik group, the high-risk group had an increased Tp-e/QT ratio (0.27±0.04 vs 0.22±0.05 P<0.01) and an increased Tp-e (105±15 vs 90±17 ms P<0.01). ROC analysis revealed that a Tp-e/QT ratio ≥0.255 had a sensitivity of 72.2% and a specificity of 65.9%, and a Tp-e ≥103 ms had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 67.9% for predicting VT and VF in these patients.
CONCLUSIONIncreased Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio are associated with increased risks of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ICD for primary prevention.