What can comparative effectiveness research, propensity score and registry study bring to Chinese medicine?
10.1007/s11655-013-1662-9
- Author:
Xing LIAO
1
;
Yan-ming XIE
Author Information
1. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Comparative Effectiveness Research;
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology);
Humans;
Medicine, Chinese Traditional;
Product Surveillance, Postmarketing;
Propensity Score;
Registries
- From:
Chinese journal of integrative medicine
2014;20(10):792-795
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The impact of evidence-based medicine and clinical epidemiology on clinical research has contributed to the development of Chinese medicine in modern times over the past two decades. Many concepts and methods of modern science and technology are emerging in Chinese medicine research, resulting in constant progress. Systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and other advanced mathematic approaches and statistical analysis methods have brought reform to Chinese medicine. In this new era, Chinese medicine researchers have many opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, Chinese medicine researchers need to dedicate themselves to providing enough evidence to the world through rigorous studies, whilst on the other hand, they also need to keep up with the speed of modern medicine research. For example, recently, real world study, comparative effectiveness research, propensity score techniques and registry study have emerged. This article aims to inspire Chinese medicine researchers to explore new areas by introducing these new ideas and new techniques.
