ObjectiveTo improve the accuracy of prostate cancer (PCa) detection by focusing biopsy on the suspected lesion manifested by MRI with the total number of biopsy cores relatively unchanged.

METHODSA prospective randomized analysis was performed on 262 cases of suspected PCa detected by multi-parametric MRI (mp-MRI), each with a single suspected lesion with 10 μg/L≤ PSA <20 μg/L. All the patients underwent targeted transrectal prostate biopsy guided by fusion imaging of MRI with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), using the 6X+6 strategy (6 cores in the suspected region and another 6 in the systematic prostate) for 134 cases and the traditional 12+2X method (12 cores in the systematic prostate and 2 in the suspected region) for the other 128. Comparisons were made between the two methods in the PCa detection rate in the cases of suspected lesion, total PCa detection rate, incidence of post-biopsy complications, and Gleason scores. Analyses were performed on the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score, location, transverse section, and diameter of the suspected lesion.

RESULTSBoth the total PCa detection rate and that in the cases of suspected lesion were significantly higher in the 6X+6 (44.8% and 37.3%) than in the 12+2X group (37.5% and 27.3%) (P<0.05). MRI showed that the suspected lesions were mostly (45%) located in the middle part of the prostate, the mean area of the transverse section was (0.48±0.11) cm2, and the mean diameter of the tumor was (8.51±2.21) mm. The results of biopsy showed that low-grade tumors (Gleason 3+3=6) accounted for 68% in the 6X+6 group and 71% in the 12+2X group. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the incidence rate of post-biopsy complications.

CONCLUSIONSCompared with the traditional 12+2X method, for the suspected lesion manifested by mp-MRI, focusing biopsy on the suspected region with the 6X+6 strategy can achieve a higher PCa detection rate without increasing the incidence of complications.