Efficacy and safety of tirofiban use after successful percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with moderate to high risk non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
- Author:
You ZHANG
1
;
Chuan-yu GAO
2
;
Zhong-yu ZHU
;
Hong-zhi LIU
;
Xian-pei WANG
;
Hong-hui YANG
;
Mu-wei LI
;
Xian-qing WANG
;
Da-tun QI
;
Da-yi HU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Acute Coronary Syndrome; therapy; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; administration & dosage; therapeutic use; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome; Tyrosine; administration & dosage; analogs & derivatives; therapeutic use
- From: Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2013;41(9):731-735
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban use immediately after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with moderate to high risk non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS).
METHODSNSTE-ACS patients undergoing successful PCI (n = 246) were randomized by the envelope method to tirofiban group (n = 122, 10 µg/kg bolus within 3 min followed by 0.10-0.15 µg×kg(-1)×min(-1) for 36 h i.v.) or control group (n = 124, saline i.v. for 36 h). The primary efficacy composite end point was death, myocardial infarction, target vascular revascularization or ischemic stroke at 30 days. The second end point was the occurrence of composite end point at 7 days or 6 months. Key safety end points were bleeding and thrombocytopenia 3 days after PCI.
RESULTSBaseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups (P > 0.05). The primary end point occurred in 0.9% (1/117) patients in the tirofiban group and 3.3% (4/123) patients of those in the control group (P = 0.40). There was no significant difference in the composite end point at 7 days [0.8% (1/122) vs. 3.2% (4/124), P = 0.38] between the groups, however, there was a trend towards lower composite efficacy end points at 6 months in tirofiban group compared to control group [0.9% (1/117) vs. 5.9% (7/118), P = 0.07]. The probability of survival free of composite end point was significantly higher in the tirofiban group than that in the control group (99.2% vs. 94.2%, log-rank test, P = 0.03). There was no GUSTO severe or moderate bleeding or severe thrombocytopenia within 3 days post-PCI. There was no significant difference in mild bleeding [13.1% (16/122) vs. 7.3% (9/124), P = 0.13] or mild thrombocytopenia [0.8% (1/122) vs. 0.8% (1/124), P = 1.00] between the groups.
CONCLUSIONTirofiban use after successful PCI can improve 6-month event-free survival without increasing the risk of bleeding for patients with moderate to high risk NSTE-ACS.