Comparison of the effects of Ginkgo biloba extract and minocycline hydrochlovide on periodontitis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2014.06.007
- VernacularTitle:银杏叶提取物与盐酸米诺环素辅助治疗牙周炎的疗效比较
- Author:
Qian CHENG
1
;
Weimin GAO
;
Bin CAO
;
Yingmei LIU
;
Zuping ZENG
;
Zuomin WANG
Author Information
1. 100020,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院口腔科
- Keywords:
Ginkgo biloba;
Periodontitis;
Bacteria;
Minocycline hydrochloride
- From:
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2014;49(6):347-351
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effect of Ginkgo biloba extract gel (Ginkgo biloba extract,EGB) and minocycline hydrochloride (Periocline) on periodontitis and their inhibition on putative periodontal pathogens.Methods Thirty patients with moderate-to-severe periodontitis were selected.The patients were divided into an experimental group and a positive control group (minocycline hydrochloride) Supragingival and subgingival scaling were performed on all patients.Subgingival plaque samples were collected before treatment,1 week,2 months and 4 months after treatment.The four major periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg),Bacteroides forsythus (Bf),Prevotella intermedia (Pi),Treponema denticola(Td) were detected by polymerase chain reaction.Clinical indexes plaque index (PLI),bleeding index(BI) and probing depth(PD),attachment loss (AL) were examined before treatment,3 months and 6 months after treatment.The results were statistically analyzed.Results The detection rates of the 4 periodontal pathogens were Td (83.3％),Tf(95.0％),Pi (80.0％),Pg(81.7％) in experimental group and Td (83.3 ％),Tf(95.0％),Pi (80.0％),Pg (81.7％) in control group before treatment.The detection rates in experimental group were not significantly different with those in control group after treatment,except for the detection rate of Pg 1 week after treatment (P ＜ 0.01,the detection of Pg was 56.7％ in experimental group and 53.3％ in control group 1 week after treatment).The PLI and BI were not significantly different between experimental group and control group after treatment (P ＞ 0.05).The difference was statistically significant at 6 months after treatment [(3.5 ± O.5) mm for experimental group and (3.2 ± 0.4) mm for control group,P =0.00].The mean of AL decreased with time.The difference was statistically significant at 6 months after treatment[(4.5 ±0.4) mm for experimental group and (4.3 ±0.4) mm for control group at 6 months,P =0.01].Conclusions The inhibition effects of EGB and minocycline hydrochloride were comparable for major periodontal pathogens within short term.
