Efficacy evaluation of anal intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for T1-2 ultra-low rectal cancer.
- Author:
Jia-gang HAN
1
;
Zhen-jun WANG
;
Guang-hui WEI
;
Hui-min XU
;
Bing-qiang YI
;
Hua-chong MA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; surgery; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Rectal Neoplasms; pathology; surgery; Treatment Outcome
- From: Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2010;13(4):256-259
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection (ISR) in T(1-2) ultra-low rectal cancer.
METHODSFrom March 2000 to March 2007, ISR with total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed in 40 patients with very low rectal cancer,among whom total ISR in 5 patients, partial ISR in 23 patients, and partial ISR with partial dentate line preservation (modified partial ISR) in 12 patients. The preoperative tumor staging was T(1-2)N(0-1)M(0).
RESULTSMorbidity was identified in 3 patients including anastomotic leakage in 1 patient and wound infection in 2 patients, and there was no postoperative mortality. The 5-year overall survival rate was 97%, and 5-year disease-free survival rate was 86%. Both patients with modified partial ISR (P=0.004) and patients with partial ISR (P=0.008) had significantly better continence than those with total ISR, and patients with a diverting stoma had significantly better continence (P=0.043) than those without a stoma at 12 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONSISR is a safe procedure for sphincter-saving rectal surgery in selected patients with very low rectal tumors. A temporary diverting stoma may be beneficial to the improvement of anal function. Modified partial ISR under the precondition of radical resection shows better anal function and lower rate of incontinence.