Effects of different modes of intermittent hypobaric hypoxia on ischemia/reperfusion injury in developing rat hearts.
- Author:
Hao ZHANG
1
;
Chang-Ying YANG
;
Ying-Ping WANG
;
Xin WANG
;
Fang CUI
;
Zhao-Nian ZHOU
;
Yi ZHANG
Author Information
1. Department of Physiology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Animals;
Heart;
Heart Ventricles;
Hypoxia;
Male;
Myocardial Reperfusion Injury;
prevention & control;
Protective Agents;
Rats;
Rats, Sprague-Dawley;
Reperfusion Injury
- From:
Acta Physiologica Sinica
2007;59(5):660-666
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The aim of the present study was to explore the effects of two different modes of intermittent hypobaric hypoxia (IHH) on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in developing rat hearts. Postnatal male sprague-Dawley rats (n=72) were divided randomly into 3 groups: intermittent hypoxia at 3 000 m (IHH3000) group, intermittent hypoxia at 5 000 m (IHH5000) group and control group. The isolated hearts were perfused in the Langendorff apparatus, undergoing 30 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Cardiac function, coronary flow and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity were recorded at 5 min before ischemia and 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 min during reperfusion, respectively. The heart weight was measured at the end of the experiment. The results showed that: (1) There was no difference in body weight gaining between IHH3000 and control groups. The gain of body weight in IHH5000 group was much lower than that in IHH3000 and control groups (P<0.01). (2) Compared with that in the control group, the recovery of cardiac function in IHH3000 group was enhanced at 60 min after ischemia/reperfusion, coronary flow was increased, and LDH activity was decreased (P<0.05), meaning a cardioprotective effect occurred. There was no significant difference in heart weight between IHH3000 and control groups. In addition, cardiac function restored better in IHH3000 group after 42 d of hypoxic exposure than that after 28 d of hypoxic exposure (P<0.05). (3) Compared with that in the control group, the recovery of cardiac function in IHH5000 group was lower, coronary flow was decreased, and LDH activity was increased (P<0.05). There was a hypertrophy in the right ventricle in IHH5000 group. All changes indicated definitely that a detrimental effect developed in IHH5000 group. The results suggest that proper IHH can protect developing rat hearts against ischemia/reperfusion injury while this effect could be affected by the modes of intermittent hypoxic exposure.
