Comparison study of biomechanical test among fixation techniques of three types screw of posterior approach for C2.
- Author:
Yong HU
1
;
Xian-feng HE
;
Wei-hu MA
;
Rong-ming XU
;
Yong-ping RUAN
;
Jian-xian FENG
;
Shu-hua YANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Screws; Cervical Vertebrae; surgery; Female; Fracture Fixation, Internal; methods; Humans; Internal Fixators; Male; Middle Aged
- From: China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2009;22(1):17-20
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the screw pull-out strength of posterior C2 when the screw is fixed to C2 through the trans-pedicle or lateral mass or trans-laminar unicortically or bicortically,so as to provide biomechanical basis for the clinical application of posterior C2 screw fixation technique.
METHODSThe pedicle screw,the lateral mass screw or the laminar screw was separately anchored into 30 fresh C2 specimens unicortically or bicortically. The screw pull-out strength of different fixation was tested and compared with the others.
RESULTSThe average pull-out strength of C2 bicortical pedicle screw was (1255.8 +/- 381.9) N, the strongest during all the methods. The mean pull-out strength of C2 unicortical pedicle screw, C2 bicortical lateral mass screw and C2 bicortical laminar screw were (901.8 +/- 373.3) N, (776.1 +/- 306.8) N and (640.8 +/- 302.9) N respectively,with no statistical difference.
CONCLUSIONPedicle screw should be the first choice for the posterior fixation on axis. C2 lateral mass screw fixation and C2 laminar screw fixation can be another supplement choice and the screw had better be placed bicortically.
