Comparative Clinical Results of Vertebroplasty Using Jamshidi(R) Needle and Bone Void Filler for Acute Vertebral Compression Fractures.
10.14245/kjs.2012.9.3.239
- Author:
Se Il JEON
1
;
Il Seung CHOE
;
Young Sub KWON
;
Dae Hee SEO
;
Kyu Chang LEE
;
Sung Choon PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Myongji Hospital, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea. psc710@kd.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Vertebroplasty;
Spinal fractures;
Osteoporosis;
Kyphoplasty
- MeSH:
Body Height;
Fractures, Compression;
Humans;
Kyphoplasty;
Needles;
Osteoporosis;
Polymethyl Methacrylate;
Spinal Fractures;
Vertebroplasty
- From:Korean Journal of Spine
2012;9(3):239-243
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is an effective treatment modality for management of osteoporotic compression fracture. However physicians sometimes have problems of high pressure in cement delivery and cement leakage when using Jamshidi(R) needle (JN). Bone void filler (BVF) has larger lumen which may possibly diminish these problems. This study aims to compare the radiologic and clinical outcome of JN and BVF for PVP. METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight patients were treated with PVP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) where 46 patients underwent PVP with JN needle and 82 patients with BVF. Radiologic outcome such as kyphotic angle and vertebral body height (VBH) and clinical outcome such as visual analog scale (VAS) scores were measured after treatment in both groups. RESULTS: In JN PVP group, mean of 3.26 cc of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were injected and 4.07 cc in BVF PVP group (p<0.001). For radiologic outcome, no significant difference in kyphotic angle reduction was observed between two groups. Cement leakage developed in 6 patients using JN PVP group and 2 patients using BVF group (p=0.025). No significant difference in improvement of VAS score was observed between JN and BVF PVP groups (p=0.43). CONCLUSION: For the treatment of osteoporotic VCF, usage of BVF for PVP may increase injected volume of cement, easily control the depth and direction of PMMA which may reduce cement leakage. However, improvement of VAS score did not show difference between two groups. Usage of BVF for PVP may be an alternative to JN PVP in selected cases.
