- Author:
De-ming HE
1
;
Yuan SHI
;
Ying-yong HOU
;
Jun HOU
;
Shao-hua LU
;
Ya-lan LIU
;
Chen XU
;
Qin HU
;
Yun-shan TAN
;
Xiong-zeng ZHU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Actins; metabolism; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antigens, CD34; metabolism; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors; metabolism; pathology; surgery; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; secondary; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; methods; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; methods; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit; metabolism; Survival Rate; Young Adult
- From: Chinese Journal of Pathology 2012;41(12):796-802
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical stage and histological grade of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
METHODSTwelve clinical and pathological parameters were assessed in 613 patients with follow-up information. These parameters were classified into two gross spread parameters including liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination, five microscopic spread parameters including lymph node metastasis, vascular, fat, nerve and mucosal infiltration, and five histological parameters including mitotic count ≥ 10 per 50 high-power fields, muscularis propria infiltration, coagulative necrosis, perivascular pattern and severe nuclear atypia.
RESULTSThe accumulated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 293 patients without any of these predictive parameters of malignancy were 99.3% and 100.0%, respectively. They were regarded as nonmalignant and further evaluations on the stage and grade of these tumors were not performed. At least one and at most seven predictive parameters of malignancy were identified in 320 patients. For these patients, the accumulated 5-year DFS and OS rates were 43.9% (mean 6.7 years) and 59.7% (mean 9.3 years), respectively. The DFS showed significant difference between patients with and without gross spread (P < 0.01), with and without microscopic spread (P = 0.001). DFS and OS were associated with the number of predictive parameters of malignancy in patients without gross spread (P < 0.01 for both DFS and OS), but not in patients with gross spread (P = 0.882 and 0.441, respectively).
CONCLUSIONSMalignant GIST could be divided into clinical stages I and II based on the absence and presence of gross spread, respectively. The degree of malignancy of patients in clinical stage I could be graded according to the number of predictive parameters of malignancy. Patients in clinical stage II were of the highest degree of malignancy regardless of the number of parameters. The staging and grading of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in this study are strongly associated with prognosis.