Bacteriology study of hypospadias.
- Author:
Ju-feng FAN
1
;
Yang-qun LI
;
Jia-Jie XU
;
Li QIANG
;
Yong-qian WANG
;
Li-qiang LIU
;
Wen CHEN
;
Sen-kai LI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Bacterial Typing Techniques; Gram-Positive Bacteria; classification; drug effects; isolation & purification; Humans; Hypospadias; microbiology; surgery; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Postoperative Period; Urethra; microbiology
- From: Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery 2005;21(1):50-52
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVEThis clinical study was to explore why the neo-urethra is liable to be infected after hypospadias operation, find the source and the common floras of infection, and accordingly, improve the peroperation procedures so as to reduce postoperative infection rate.
METHODSThe pathogenic floras were examined and analyzed by germiculture and karyotype analysis.
RESULTSThe bacteria in the neo-urethra mostly came from the orifice and the reconstruction material of the urethra. The most common floras that caused infection were gram-positive coccus. The most sensitive antibiotics for hypospadias infection were demethylvancomycin.
CONCLUSIONThe postoperative infection of hypospadias is incisional, not the urinary system infection. Because the microenvironment of the neo-urethra is more suitable for infection than that of the skin or mucosa, the reconstructed urethra is likely to be infected.