Indication of fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated by "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy.
- Author:
Yuan-ming CHEN
1
;
An-min JIN
;
Hui ZHANG
;
Li-xin ZHU
;
Shao-xiong MIN
;
Li ZHANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Decompression, Surgical; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fusion; methods; Spinal Stenosis; surgery; Treatment Outcome
- From: Chinese Journal of Surgery 2010;48(1):31-34
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo explore the indications of fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated by "windows technique".
METHODSFrom December 1999 to December 2005, 145 consecutive patients who were treated by primary decompression with "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, a retrospective study, were divided into 3 groups (A and B and C) by preoperative lumbar conditions and surgical methods. In group A, 39 patients with spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis underwent decompression and fusion; in group B, 31 patients with spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis underwent decompression alone; In group C, 75 patients without spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis were treated by decompression without fusion. On hospital medical records to review, they were followed up by telephone and out-patient referral. Statistics the duration of hospitalization, operative time, estimated blood loss; Observed recrudescence and reoperation and complication; and using Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale and satisfaction rate for efficacy assessment, application SPSS 13.0 software.
RESULTSAll 145 patients had at least a 3-year follow-up (ranging 37 to 108 months). In the group C, the duration of hospitalization less than in the group A or B (P < 0.05); In the group A, the operative time and estimated blood loss greater than in the group B or C (P < 0.05); The group B treated by decompression alone in the presence of instability or spondylolisthesis or scoliosis showed the worst results by the Oswestry Disability Index or Visual Analog Scale or ate of satisfaction (P < 0.05). The same good results can be obtained in the group A and C. There were not different about recrudescence or reoperation or complication in the three groups.
CONCLUSIONSFusion should be performed on patients with instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after primary decompression with "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy. The patient with simple lumbar spinal stenosis undergone primary surgery does not require fusion.