Effect of Enalpril on LVH and LV Performance in Essential Hypertension.
10.4070/kcj.1995.25.5.1023
- Author:
Dong Chul LEE
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Enalapril;
LVH;
LV diastolic function
- MeSH:
Antihypertensive Agents;
Blood Pressure;
Echocardiography;
Enalapril;
Heart Rate;
Humans;
Hypertension*;
Prognosis;
Ventricular Septum
- From:Korean Circulation Journal
1995;25(5):1023-1028
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy(LVH) is the independent poor prognostic factor in hypertensives. But, it is uncertain that the reduction of LVH by antihypertensives therapy will improve the prognosis of hypertensive patioents. THe effect of reduction of LVH on LV function(espacially diastolic function) and the mechanism of reduction of LVH are not clarified also. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether reduction in LV mass with enalapril has a beneficial effect ofn LV diastolic filling in hypertensive patients with diastolic dysfunction. METHODS: Mild to moderate hypertensive patients were treated with enalapril(10-20mg once daily) for 4 months. Their blood pressure and pulse rate were regularly measured devery 2 weeks. Using M mode echocardiograms, LV dimensions at end-diastole and end-systole, thicknesses of ventricular septum and LV free wall were measured. LV ejection fraction(EF), LV mass index(LVMI) and total peripheral resistance(TPR) were calculated. Pulsed ddoppler examination of transmitranl flow for assessment of LV diastolic function was performend from apical four chamber viw. The peak flow velocities of the early and late waves and their ratio(PFVE, PFVA, PFVE/PFVA) were measured from consecutive 3 cardiac cycles. In addition, the time velocity integral of the early and late waves and their ratio(EA, AA, EA/AA) were measured. Echocardiographic evaluations were performed at baseline and at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased after treatment with enalapril. But there was no significant difference of pulse rate between basal and after treatment. The LV dimensions at end-diastole and end-systole and the thickness of LV free wall didn't change significantly. The thickness of interventricular septum, LVMI and TPR reduced significantly after treatment. The ejection fraction of LV didn't change significantly after treatment. There was no significant change in PFVE, EA, AA and EA/AA. But PFVA was significantly decreased after treatment with enalapril for 4 months. PFVE/PFVA was significantly increased also. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, antihypertensive treatment with enalapril led to a significant reduction of LVH partially associated with improvement in LV diastolic performance and no deterioration of LV systolic function.
