Prostate-specific Antigen Density Variation Rate as a Potential Guideline Parameter for Second Prostate Cancer Detection Biopsy.
- Author:
Gan-Sheng XIE
1
;
Jin-Xing LYV
1
;
Gang LI
1
;
Chun-Yin YAN
1
;
Jian-Quan HOU
1
;
Jin-Xian PU
1
;
Xiang DING
1
;
Yu-Hua HUANG
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Aged; Biopsy; methods; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prostate; metabolism; pathology; Prostate-Specific Antigen; blood; Prostatic Neoplasms; blood; diagnosis; ROC Curve
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2016;129(15):1800-1804
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDThe diagnostic value of current prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests is challenged by the poor detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) in repeat prostate biopsy. In this study, we proposed a novel PSA-related parameter named PSA density variation rate (PSADVR) and designed a clinical trial to evaluate its potential diagnostic value for detecting PCa on a second prostate biopsy.
METHODSData from 184 males who underwent second ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy 6 months after the first biopsy were included in the study. The subjects were divided into PCa and non-PCa groups according to the second biopsy pathological results. Prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), free-total PSA ratio, and PSADVR were calculated according to corresponding formulas at the second biopsy. These parameters were compared using t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test between PCa and non-PCa groups, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to evaluate their predictability on PCa detection.
RESULTSPCa was detected in 24 patients on the second biopsy. Mean values of PSA, PSAD, and PSADVR were greater in the PCa group than in the non-PCa group (8.39 μg/L vs. 7.16 μg/L, 0.20 vs. 0.16, 14.15% vs. -1.36%, respectively). PSADVR had the largest area under the curve, with 0.667 sensitivity and 0.824 specificity when the cutoff was 10%. The PCa detection rate was significantly greater in subjects with PSADVR >10% than PSADVR ≤10% (28.6% vs. 6.5%, P< 0.001). In addition, PSADVR was the only parameter in this study that showed a significant correlation with mid-to-high-risk PCa (r = 0.63, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONSOur results demonstrated that PSADVR improved the PCa detection rate on second biopsies, especially for mid-to-high-risk cancers requiring prompt treatment.