Is decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction of any worth?
- Author:
Xiao-feng YANG
1
;
Yu YAO
;
Wei-wei HU
;
Gu LI
;
Jin-fang XU
;
Xue-qun ZHAO
;
Wei-guo LIU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Craniotomy; methods; Decompression, Surgical; methods; Female; Humans; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery; diagnosis; surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Recovery of Function; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
- From: Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 2005;6(7):644-649
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVEMalignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction is characterized by mortality rate of up to 80%. The aim of this study was to determine the value of decompressive craniectomy in patients presenting malignant MCA infarction compared with those receiving medical treatment alone.
METHODSPatients with malignant MCA infarction treated in our hospital between January 1996 and March 2004 were included in this retrospective analysis. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used to assess neurological status on admission and at one week after surgery. All patients were followed up for assessment of functional outcome by the Barthel index (BI) and modified Rankin Scale (RS) at 3 months after infarction.
RESULTSTen out of 24 patients underwent decompressive craniectomy. The mean interval between stroke onset and surgery was 62.10 h. The mortality was 10.0% compared with 64.2% in patients who received medical treatment alone (P<0.001). The mean NIHSS score before surgery was 26.0 and 15.4 after surgery (P<0.001). At follow up, patients who underwent surgery had significantly better outcome with mean BI of 53.3, RS of 3.3 as compared to only 16.0 and 4.60 in medically treated patients. Speech function also improved in patients with dominant hemispherical infarction.
CONCLUSIONDecompressive craniectomy in patients with malignant MCA infarction improves both survival rates and functional outcomes compared with medical treatment alone. A randomized controlled trial is required to substantiate those findings.