Experimental study of the correlation of telomerase and intramedullary scar after spinal cord injury in rats.
- Author:
Ming-kun YANG
1
;
Wei-bin SHENG
;
Tao XU
;
Hai-long GUO
;
Kai HUANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Animals; Cicatrix; enzymology; Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein; metabolism; Neuroglia; enzymology; pathology; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Spinal Cord Injuries; enzymology; pathology; Telomerase; metabolism
- From: Chinese Journal of Surgery 2012;50(12):1113-1118
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo detect the expression of telomerase in glial scar and its correlation with glial scar.
METHODSThere were 120 Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into non-interference group of telomerase, interference group of telomerase and control group. Non-interference group and interference group were for spinal cord injury, which adopted Allen's Weight Dropping to make molding; control group was for sham operation to open the vertebral plate and expose spinal marrow, in which spinal cord injury would not be caused. The expression of telomerase and glial fibrillary acidic profein (GFAP) was detected by PCR-ELISA and Western blot, and the formation of glial scar was observed by immunofluorescence on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 14th, 28th, 42 th and 56th day after the spinal injury, and analyzed its relativity.
RESULTSThe expression of telomerase in non-interference group was (0.180 ± 0.004 - 1.217 ± 0.072), which was significantly higher than those in interference group (0.028 ± 0.007 - 0.092 ± 0.004, χ(2) = 28.753 - 37.518, P < 0.05) and control group (0.072 ± 0.007 - 0.075 ± 0.004, χ(2) = 18.618 - 41.093, P < 0.05) at all the time, with statistical significance. The expression of GFAP in non-interference group was (1.98 ± 0.15 - 19.40 ± 0.55) which was significantly higher than those in interference group (1.10 ± 0.13 - 16.64 ± 1.02, χ(2) = 14.538 - 37.366, P < 0.05) and control group (0.44 ± 0.05 - 0.48 ± 0.04, χ(2) = 16.733 - 34.041, P < 0.05) at all the time, with statistical significance. The expression of GFAP showed a linear correlation with that of telomerase in non-interference group, and with statistical differences (r = 0.755, P < 0.01). The expression of telomerase in interference group and control group were always negative. Glial scar observed by immunofluorescence in non-interference group was heavier than that in interference group, and control group showed no formation of glial scar.
CONCLUSIONSTelomerase shows a dynamic expression in glial scar and has positive correlational linear relationship with GFAP which shows the formation of glial scar. And the telomerase may be an important factor in promoting the formation of glial scar.