- VernacularTitle:慢性丙型肝炎个体化治疗方案的临床研究
- Author:
Yue-Min NAN
1
;
Huan-Wei ZHENG
;
Dian-Xing SUN
;
Chun-Mian AN
;
You-Sheng LI
;
Li KONG
;
Er-Hei DAI
;
Yu-Guo ZHANG
;
Su-Xian ZHAO
;
Shan-Shan SU
;
Yan-Hong JIA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Hepatitis C, Chronic; drug therapy; Humans; Interferon-alpha; therapeutic use; Polyethylene Glycols; therapeutic use; Prospective Studies; Ribavirin; therapeutic use; Treatment Outcome
- From: Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2013;21(1):23-26
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate the outcomes of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients treated with antiviral regimens of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) using individualized doses and durations.
METHODSThis study was designed as an open-label, prospective clinical trial to analyze the virological responses of 169 CHC patients who received individualized dosages of IFNa-2b or pegylated (Peg)IFNa-2a combined with RBV based on their weight ( less than 60 kg or more than or equal to 60 kg), age (less than 65 years or 65-75 years), morbid state (liver cirrhosis or not), and complications (such as heart disease, diabetes, thyroid disorder). Treatment duration was calculated using the time required to induce HCV RNA negativity. The rates of virological response and adverse effects among the different groups were compared.
RESULTSThe IFNa-2b treatment was given to 116 patients, and PegIFNa-2a was given to 53 patients. Compared to the IFNa-2b group, the PegIFNa-2a group showed significantly higher rates of complete early virological response (cEVR; 76.7% vs. 92.5%, P less than 0.05) and sustained virological response (SVR; 53.6% vs. 92.3%, P less than 0.05) among the patients who had completed their course of treatment; the rapid virological response (RVR) rate was also higher for the PegIFNa-2a group but the difference did not reach statistical significance (48.7% vs. 60.4%, P more than 0.05). Seventy-eight patients received the routine dose, and 91 patients received the low dose; there were no significant differences between these two groups for RVR (53.8% vs. 58.9%, P more than 0.05), cEVR (78.0% vs. 80.8%, P more than 0.05), or SVR (65.5% vs. 58.3%, P more than 0.05).
CONCLUSIONUse of an individualized antiviral treatment strategy designed according to the patient's baseline condition, early viral kinetics, and tolerability to adverse reactions can achieve a high rate of SVR, as well as improve the safety, prognosis, and cost-effectiveness associated with treating CHC patients.