Research on the influence of different implant site on the implant-bone-interface stress distribution in zygomatic implant denture.
- Author:
Shun-li CHU
1
;
Yan-min ZHOU
;
Gui-ping YUE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Bicuspid; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dentures; Finite Element Analysis; Humans; Maxilla; Molar; Stress, Mechanical
- From: West China Journal of Stomatology 2010;28(1):81-86
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo probe the implant-bone-interface stress distribution of zygomatic implant denture concerning different implant sites.
METHODSThree-dimensional finite element model for severe atrophy maxillary posterior-tooth area was established biomechanically in this study by computer technique and zygomatic implant was simulated into the model in the first-maxillary-premolar region, the second-maxillary-premolar region, the first-maxillary-molar region and the second-maxillary-molar region respectively. Vertical loading, buccal (30 degrees) loading and lingual (30 degrees) loading were preformed, 100 N. Then these load cases were calculated and analyzed.
RESULTS1) When the implant site was placed in the first-maxillary-premolar region, the buccal side of zygomatic implant exposed out of the bone and didn't meet the clinical request. 2) As far as the tensile stress peak value in the maxillary posterior-tooth area was concerned, the highest value was recorded when the implant was placed in the second-maxillary-molar region, and then the medium value was recorded when the implant was placed in the second-maxillary-premolar region, and the smallest was recorded when the implant in the first-maxillary-molar region. As far as the compressive stress peak value in the maxillary posterior-tooth area was concerned, the highest value was recorded when the implant was placed in the second-maxillary-molar region, and then the medium was recorded when the implant was in the first-maxillary-molar region, and the smallest value was presented when the implant was in the second-maxillary-premolar region. As far as the tensile and compressive stress peak values in the zygomatic area were concerned, the highest value was recorded when the implant was in the second-maxillary-premolar region, and then the medium value when the implant was in the first-maxillary-molar region, and the smallest when the implant was in the second-maxillary-molar region.
CONCLUSIONThe first-maxillary-molar region is the best implant site of zygomatic implant denture.
