Discussion on the meaning of MELD score in the opportunity of the entecavir treatment of HBeAg-negative acute-on-chronic liver failure.
- Author:
Ying YAN
1
;
Li MAI
;
Jian-Yun ZHU
;
Ying ZHANG
;
Wei-Min KE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; therapeutic use; DNA, Viral; blood; End Stage Liver Disease; drug therapy; virology; Female; Guanine; analogs & derivatives; therapeutic use; Hepatitis B e Antigens; blood; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Severity of Illness Index
- From: Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology 2011;25(6):466-469
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo explore the opportunity and effect of internal general treatment added entecavir on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients in different ranges of MELD score.
METHODSA total of 101 ACLF of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients treated with internal general treatment added entecavir were divided into three groups according to the MELD score. The mortalities and HBV DNA loads during the initiation of therapy, recovery phase and in deathbed phase were studied.
RESULTS20 of patients with high MELD score (> or = 30) received (14.6 +/- 14.1) days treatment. The difference in MELD score between pre-(36.03 +/- 5.01) and post-treatment (39.86 +/- 5.95) was significant (t = - 2.994, P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in HBV DNA load between pre-[(4.454 +/- 1.714) copies log10/ml] and post-treatment [(3.979 +/- 1.947) copies log10/ml] (t = 2.212, P = 0.051), the mortality was 100% (20/20). 47 of patients with moderate MELD score (22-30) received (51.5 +/- 41.6) days treatment. There was no significant difference in MELD score between pre-(25.71 +/- 2.47) and post-treatment (26.18 +/- 13.32) (t = - 0.263, P = 0.794). The difference in MELD score between pre-[(6.084 +/- 1.795) copies log10/ml] and post-treatment [(3.378 +/- 2.156) copies log10/ml] was significant (t =7.148, P = 0.000), the mortality was 53.19% (25/47). 34 of patients with low MELD score (< or = 22) received (67.2 +/- 40.9) days treatment. The difference in MELD score was significant between pre-(< or = 18.85 +/- 2.72) and post-treatment (11.68 +/- 7.23) (t = 5.983, P = 0.000). There was significant difference in HBV DNA load between pre-[(5. 945 +/- 1.635) copies log10/ml] and post-treatment [(2.725 +/- 1.194) copies log10/ml] (t = 9.962, P = 0.000), the mortality was 2.94% (1/34).
CONCLUSIONSThe ACLF of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with a low score of MELD score (< or = 22) mostly survive with internal general treatment added entecavir. The mortality of the patients with a MELD score (22-30) is 53.19% (25/47). The patients with high MELD score (> or = 30) which almost lack the opportunity of treatment, is associated with fatal liver failure and need for emergency liver transplantation.
