The Usefulness of Multiplanar Reconstruction Images in Preoperative T-staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer.
10.3348/jkrs.2004.51.2.241
- Author:
Young Baek KOO
1
;
Suk KIM
;
Jun Woo LEE
;
Soo Jin KIM
;
Ki Seok CHOO
;
Tae Hong LEE
;
Tae Yong MOON
;
Suk Hong LEE
;
Tae Yong JEON
Author Information
1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Computed tomography (CT), multi-detector row;
Stomach, neoplasms
- MeSH:
Diagnosis;
Humans;
Stomach Neoplasms*
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2004;51(2):241-248
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of multidetector-row CT (MDCT) in the preoperative T-staging of patients with advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 65 patients with an established diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer (T2 or more) were evaluated with MDCT. The protocol of MDCT consisted of high-quality (HQ) mode helical scanning with a slice thickness of 2.5 mm. The axial CT images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 5 mm. MPR images were reconstructed from the raw axial data with a slice thickness of 5 mm. A comparison between the standard axial and axial MPR images was performed by two radiologists with regard to the evaluation of the tumor location and T-stage. These findings were compared with the pathologic and surgical findings. RESULTS: T-staging of the advanced stomach cancer was correct in 89% (58/65) and 69% (45/65) of the MPR images and axial images, respectively. The MPR images improved the detection rate (5 lesions)of the tumors and increased the accuracy of the T-staging (13 lesions) in comparison with the axial images. The MPR images are of greater diagnostic value for the evaluation of omental seeding (5 lesions: axial images, 9 lesions: MPR images), tumor location and extension. CONCLUSION: Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images provide increased confidence in the location and T-staging of certain cases of advanced gastric cancer, such as those in locations where CT images are susceptible to be affected by the difficulties associated with partial volume averaging. In this study, the MPR images provided more precise information about the tumor location and T-staging than the standard axial images in the preoperative evaluation of advanced gastric cancer.
