Various Designs of Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap for Buttock Reconstruction.
- Author:
Seung Eun HONG
1
;
Jai Kyong PYON
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. pspriest@ewha.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Gluteal artery perforator;
Perforator flap;
Buttock reconstruction;
Sacral sore
- MeSH:
Arteries*;
Axis, Cervical Vertebra;
Buttocks*;
Esthetics;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Melanoma;
Necrosis;
Perforator Flap*;
Pliability;
Tissue Donors;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2007;34(2):197-202
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The gluteal artery perforator flaps earned its popularity in buttock reconstruction due to the lower morbidity of the donor site and the flexibility in the design. Speedy and safe reconstruction is important for the success of buttock reconstruction. If a proper design is selected, satisfactory results can be obtained with more simple method of surgery. METHODS: Between April 2005 and April 2006, buttock reconstruction by using gluteal artery perforator flaps were performed on sacral sores(6 cases), ischial sores(2 cases) and malignant melanoma on buttock(1 case). Various designs depending on the location and the size of the defect was made. In those designs, perforator was used as an axis for the minimal dissection of the vessel. Donor site from which sufficient amount of soft tissue can be transferred was selected, and also not causing high tension against the recipient site during the donor site closure. In addition, postoperative aesthetics, and the possibility of another design of a second operation which can be necessary in the future, was considered. RESULTS: Patient follow up was for a mean period of 10.8 months. All flaps survived except for one that had undergone partial necrosis. Wound dehiscence was observed in one patient treated by secondary closure. Most patients presented with cosmetically and functionally satisfying results CONCLUSION: By designing the flap using the perforator as an axis, depending on the defect size and degree, reconstruction can be performed with only a small tension to the donor and the recipient site. And the minimal perforator dissection allowed easier and faster reconstruction. Selection of a proper design is the key procedure which greatly affects operation time and result success.
