OBJECTIVETo study the influence of Suspension Pancreatic-Duct-Jejunum End-to-Side Continuous Suture Anastomosis (SPDJCS) on the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and to analyze its applicability, safety, and efficacies.

METHODSA prospective controlled trial was conducted with 165 cases receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery from January 2010 to May 2012. The patients were divided into Group A (end-to-end/end-to-side invaginated anastomosis, n=52), Group B (end-to-side mucosal anastomosis, n=48), and Group C (SPDJCS, n=65). The preoperative data, intraoperative data, and operative outcomes (incidence of pancreatic fistula, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, peritoneal drainage, peritoneal hemorrhage, peritoneal abscess, delayed gastric emptying, pulmonary infection, postoperative infection, blood transfusion, and perioperative mortality) were compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTSThe total incidence of pancreatic fistula was 13.9% (23/165) in all the 165 patients. The incidence in Group A and Group B was 23.1% (12/52) and 18.8% (9/48), both higher than that in Group C [3.1% (2/65), both P<0.05]. Group C showed significantly better outcomes than group A and B in terms of the operation time (5.5±1.2 hours vs. 6.1±1.1 hours, 5.5±1.2 hours vs. 6.3±1.5 hours), volume of blood loss (412.0±205.0 mL vs. 525.0±217.0 mL, 412.0±205.0 mL vs. 514.0±217.0 mL), and postoperative drainage amount of plasma tubes (175.0±65.0 mL vs. 275.0±80.0 mL, 175.0±65.0 mL vs. 255.0±75.0 mL) (all P<0.05), while Group A and Group B displayed no difference in these aspects (P>0.05). As complications other than pancreatic fistula were concerned, the three groups were not different from each other (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONSSPDJCS may have the effect of reducing the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. It could be safe, practical and convenient technique of anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy.