Biocompatibility of new bone tissue engineering scaffolds in vivo.
- Author:
Yi LI
1
;
Wei RAN
;
Gai-ling WANG
;
Xiang-dong JING
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Animals; Biocompatible Materials; Bone and Bones; Calcium Phosphates; Lactates; Lactic Acid; Polyesters; Polyethylene Glycols; Polymers; Rabbits; Tissue Engineering; Tissue Scaffolds
- From: West China Journal of Stomatology 2009;27(4):447-450
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate the biocompatibility of new bone tissue engineering scaffolds, A:D, L-polylactic acid (PDLLA)/polylactic acid-polyethylene glycol-polylactic acid-polylactic acid (PLA-PEG-PLA)/Tricalcium phosphate and B: PDLLA/PLA-PEG-PLA in vivo, compared with PDLLA in repair of a rabbit mandibular body defect.
METHODS24 New Zealand adult rabbits were divided into 4 groups randomly. 15 mm x 6 mm defects were made surgically in the bilateral mandibular bodies and each hemi-mandible was assigned as an experimental unit. The defects were randomly repaired with scaffold materials in each group. Specimens obtained were evaluated with general observation, X-ray, histomorphology and computerized graphical analysis at 2, 4 , 8, 12 weeks after surgery.
RESULTSCompared with PDLLA, the new scaffold materials B showed biocompatibility. At the same time the quantity of new bone produced was much more than that in control group (P<0.05). The new scaffold materials A showed the clear chronic granulomatous inflammation.
CONCLUSIONNew scaffold material B had sound biocompatibility. It was much better than PDLLA. So it may be an ideal bone tissue engineering scaffold material. A is not adapted to be used as scaffold material.