Evaluation of the capacity of personal protection on poison emergency items in Chinese disease control and prevention institutes.
- Author:
Li-jing XIE
1
;
Jing ZHOU
;
Cong-shen MENG
;
Shou-lin ZHANG
;
Hong-shun ZHANG
;
Shao-feng JIANG
;
Ming-liang WANG
;
Cheng-ye SUN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: China; Emergencies; Humans; Occupational Exposure; Poisoning; prevention & control; Protective Clothing
- From: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2009;43(2):146-150
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo analyze the capacity of personal protection on poison emergency items in Chinese disease control and prevention institutes.
METHODSEvaluation analysis based on data obtained from investigating personal protection equipments and professional knowledge quizzing about personal protection in poisoning control of 57 different level centers for disease control and prevention selected from China by a multi-stage stratified sampling.
RESULTSAll 80.70% of the institutes possessed the protection equipments, provincial, municipal, county level institutes were 100.00%, 95.24%, 66.67%, respectively, with significant statistical difference (H = 7.94, P < 0.05). The average level of the type of individual protective equipments in disease control and prevention institutes was (5.42 +/- 4.00) kinds, the average points in category of provincial, municipal, county level institutes were (11.33 +/- 3.67), (6.52 +/- 3.16), (3.47 +/- 3.10) kinds, being statistically significant (F = 17.30, P < 0.05); type difference counts of disease control and prevention institutes in economic development, secondary, less-developed regions were (6.41 +/- 4.03), (3.55 +/- 3.35), (6.45 +/- 4.07) kinds, with statistical significance (F = 3.70, P < 0.05). Protection equipments chiefly possessed were latex gloves, gauze masks and C-protective clothing. Protective clothing and respiratory protective equipments were insufficient evidently. The average points in testing personal protection basic knowledge were (71.39 +/- 12.52) points; there were no differences between different institutes with different economic regions, levels, technical posts and title degrees.
CONCLUSIONCertain advances have been achieved in recent years in personal protection capacity of institutes for disease control and prevention, but far from the actual demands, and maybe no enough effective response on emergency occurred.