Comparative study of 4Fr catheters using the ACIST variable rate injector system versus 6Fr catheters using hand manifold in diagnostic coronary angiography via transradial approach.
- Author:
Lei HOU
1
;
Yi-dong WEI
;
Jing SONG
;
Wen-liang CHE
;
Wen-hui PENG
;
Yong WANG
;
Wei-ming LI
;
Ya-wei XU
;
Da-yi HU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Clinical Trial
- MeSH: Aged; Cardiac Catheterization; instrumentation; Coronary Angiography; instrumentation; methods; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Radial Artery; diagnostic imaging; Ultrasonography
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2010;123(11):1373-1376
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDThe transradial approach is regarded as a useful vascular site for coronary procedures. The aim of this study was to test whether 4Fr catheters assisted by ACIST variable rate injector system can produce comparable angiographic quality and reduce the risk of radial artery injury compared to hand manifold 6 Fr catheters.
METHODSA total of 1816 patients were studied consecutively, among whom 856 patients received coronary angiography by 4 Fr catheters (4Fr group) and 960 patients by 6 Fr catheters (6Fr group). Angiographic and procedural characteristics were observed and recorded. The luminal inner radial arterial diameter before and after the procedure were collected.
RESULTSThe baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in procedure time, radiation dose and quality scores in both groups (P > 0.05), but more contrast media was delivered in the 6Fr group (P < 0.001). The mean radial arterial diameter six months after the procedure in the 6Fr group reduced significantly compared to that measured one day prior to the procedure (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONSCoronary angiography using the 4Fr catheters with Acist power injection system can achieve an acceptable diagnostic quality while at the same time minimizing radial artery injury and contrast media consumption.
