Clinical value of artificial insemination by donor.
- Author:
Yan ZHANG
1
;
Xiao-Qing CHEN
;
Xiao-Yu YANG
;
Juan DONG
;
Xiao-Qiao QIAN
;
Wei WANG
;
Yun-Dong MAO
;
Jia-Yin LIU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Azoospermia; therapy; Female; Humans; Insemination, Artificial, Heterologous; Male; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Retrospective Studies
- From: National Journal of Andrology 2010;16(1):20-23
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical value of artificial insemination by donor (AID).
METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed 480 cycles of AID among 258 infertile couples, who were divided according to the women's age into a < or = 30 yr group and a > or = 31 yr group.
RESULTSA total of 120 pregnancies were achieved in 480 AID cycles, with a cycle pregnancy rate of 25.00% and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 46.51%. In the natural cycles, the cycle pregnancy rate was 29.65% and the cumulative pregnancy rate was 51.00% in the < or = 30 yr group, significantly higher than 13.33% and 25.00% in the > or = 31 yr group (P < 0.05). In the ovulation induction cycles, no significant differences were found in the cycle and cumulative pregnancy rates between the two groups (24.02 and 48.86% versus 23.81 and 43.48% , P > 0.05). The cycle and cumulative pregnancy rates decreased with the increase of infertility duration and the women's age, but had no significant differences. In the first four cycles, the cycle pregnancy rates were 24.03, 24.94, 24.69 and 25.00% (P > 0.05), and the cumulative pregnancy rates were 24.03, 39.53, 45.74 and 46.51%, with significant differences between the first cycle and the other three (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONOvulation induction is superior to natural cycle in AID for older women. IVF/ICSI can be resorted to only after AID has failed three or four times.