Lumbar spine superior-level facet joint violations: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw insertion using intraoperative 3-dimensional computer-assisted navigation.

Wei Tian; Yunfeng XU; Bo Liu; Yajun Liu; Da HE; Qiang Yuan; Zhao Lang; Yanwei Lyu; Xiaoguang Han; Peihao Jin

Return

Lumbar spine superior-level facet joint violations: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw insertion using intraoperative 3-dimensional computer-assisted navigation.

Author: Wei TIAN ^{1
,

2} ; Yunfeng XU ¹ ; Bo LIU ¹ ; Yajun LIU ³ ; Da HE ³ ; Qiang YUAN ³ ; Zhao LANG ³ ; Yanwei LYU ³ ; Xiaoguang HAN ¹ ; Peihao JIN ¹ ;
Author Information

1. Medical Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2. Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China. Email: spinebjjst@126.com.
3. Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.
Publication Type:Journal Article
MeSH: Aged; Female; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Pedicle Screws; Prospective Studies; Zygapophyseal Joint; surgery
From: Chinese Medical Journal 2014;127(22):3852-3856
CountryChina
Language:English
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDPercutaneous pedicle screw use has a high rate of cranial facet joint violations (FVs) because of the facet joint being indirectly visualized. Computer-assisted navigation shows the anatomic structures clearly, and may help to lower the rate of FVs during pedicle screw insertion. This study used computed tomography (CT) to evaluate and compare the incidence of FVs between percutaneous and open surgeries employing computer-assisted navigation for the implantation of pedicle screw instrumentation during lumbar fusions.
METHODSA prospective study, including 142 patients having lumbar and lumbosacral fusion, was conducted between January 2013 and April 2014. All patients had bilateral posterior pedicle screw-rod instrumentation (top-loading screws) implanted by the same group of surgeons; intraoperative 3-dimensional computer navigation was used during the procedures. All patients underwent CT examinations within 6 months postoperation. The CT scans were independently reviewed by three reviewers blinded to the technique used.
RESULTSThe cohort comprised 68 percutaneous and 74 open cases (136 and 148 superior-level pedicle screw placements, respectively). Overall, superior-level FVs occurred in 20 patients (20/142, 14.1%), involving 27 top screws (27/284, 9.5%). The percutaneous technique (7.4% of patients, 3.7% of top screws) had a significantly lower violation rate than the open procedure (20.3% of patients, 14.9% of top screws). The open group also had significantly more serious violations than did the percutaneous group. Both groups had a higher violation rate when the cranial fixation involved the L5. A 1-level open procedure had a higher violation rate than did the 2- and 3-level surgeries.
CONCLUSIONSWith computer-assisted navigation, the placement of top-loading percutaneous screws carries a lower risk of adjacent-FVs than does the open technique; when FVs occur, they tend to be less serious. Performing a single-level open lumbar fusion, or the fusion of the L5-S1 segment, requires caution to avoid cranial adjacent FVs.