OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer by comparing the efficacy of laparoscopy and open surgery.

METHODSClinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopy or open surgery in Zhongshan Hospital from April 2011 to June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively, and the clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTSNinety-six rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery(LS) were enrolled. A total of 216 rectal cancer patients underwent open surgery(OS). There was no operative death in both groups. In LS and OS group, the overall completion rates of TME were 86.4%(83/96) vs. 89.3%(193/216)(P>0.05) respectively, and the overall anal reservation rates were 78.1%(75/96) vs. 75.0%(162/216)(P>0.05) respectively. The mean distance to proximal resection margin and distal resection margin respectively were (10.3±4.1) cm vs.(10.0±4.3) cm(P>0.05) and (3.4±0.9) cm vs. (3.6±1.4) cm(P>0.05) respectively. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes respectively were (12.8±5.2) vs.(13.7±6.4)(P>0.05). Compared to OS, LS presented less blood loss [(98.0±28.7) ml vs. (175.0±41.0) ml, P<0.05], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(9.4±4.9) d vs.(11.6±6.2) d, P<0.05], quicker postoperative recovery of bowel function[(2.7±0.9) d vs. (3.4±0.9) d, P<0.05], shorter postoperative time to intake semi-solid[(3.7±1.2) d vs. (4.4±1.5) d, P<0.05], less postoperative complications(15.6% vs. 25.9%, P<0.05), but longer operative time[(155.7±48.4) min vs. (120.0±26.7) min, P<0.05]. Postoperative follow-up was 6 to 24 months, and the local recurrence of LS and OS was 2.1% and 2.3%(P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic surgery can obtain the same radical efficacy for rectal cancer as compared to open surgery.