Susceptibility-Weighted MR Imaging for the Detection of Developmental Venous Anomaly: Comparison with T2 and FLAIR Imaging.
10.13104/jksmrm.2014.18.3.200
- Author:
Soo Bueum CHO
1
;
Dae Seob CHOI
;
Hyeon Gyu RYU
;
Hwa Seon SHIN
;
Ji Eun KIM
;
Hye Young CHOI
;
Mi Jung PARK
;
Ho Cheol CHOI
;
Seungnam SON
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea. choids@gnu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cerebral developmental venous anomaly;
Magnetic resonance (MR);
Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI)
- MeSH:
Brain;
Consensus;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*;
Retrospective Studies;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2014;18(3):200-207
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We evaluated the diagnostic value of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) for the detection of developmental venous anomaly (DVA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 1068 brain MR examinations found 28 DVAs in 28 patients (2.6%) on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. SWI, T2, and FLAIR images of 28 patients with DVA and 28 sex- and age-matched control patients without DVA were analyzed by blinded readers on each type of sequences. All images were independently reviewed by two radiologists who were blinded to other MR imaging finding. In cases of discrepancy, two reviewers reached a consensus later. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each MR sequence for the detection of DVA were determined. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Mcnemar test. The significance level was p < 0.05. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of SWI for the detection of DVA were 85.7%, 92.9%, 92.3%, and 86.7%, respectively. T2 and FLAIR images showed sensitivity of 35.7% and 35.7%, specificity of 92.9% and 96.4%, PPV of 83.3% and 90.9%, and NPV of 59.1% and 60.0%, respectively. On SWI, the sensitivity and NPV for the detection of DVAs were significantly higher than those of T2 and FLAIR images (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SWI was sensitive and specific for the detection of DVA.
