Pseudoradial Tear of the Medial Meniscus: A Relatively Common Potential Pitfall.
10.13104/jksmrm.2014.18.3.219
- Author:
Woo Young YOU
1
;
Jung Ah CHOI
;
Kyoung Jin OH
;
Seon Jeong MIN
;
Jae Jeong CHOI
;
Suk Ki CHANG
;
Dae Hyun HWANG
;
Ik Won KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea. jachoi88@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Knee;
Meniscus;
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MeSH:
Animals;
Arthroscopy;
Ethics Committees, Research;
Horns;
Humans;
Incidence;
Informed Consent;
Knee;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Medical Records;
Menisci, Tibial*;
Protons;
Retrospective Studies;
Tears*
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2014;18(3):219-224
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of truncated triangle appearance of anterior horn (AH) to body of medial meniscus (MM) and determine its clinical significance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB approval was obtained, and informed consent waived for this study. The criteria of "pseudoradial tear" was truncated triangle appearance of the tip of AH to body of MM on one or more coronal images with adjacent fluid signal intensity at the blunted tip. Two musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively evaluated 485 knee MR images independently for the presence and number of sections with "pseudoradial tear" of AH to body of MM using proton density-weighted coronal MR images. Inter-and intraobserver agreement was calculated using kappa coefficients. Medical records were reviewed for arthroscopic correlation. RESULTS: A pseudoradial tear in the AH to body of MM was present in 381 (78.6%) patients. Locations were 112 in AH (29.4%), 143 in AH to body (37.5%), and 126 in body (33.1%). Number of consecutive sections of pseudoradial tear were 1 in 100 (26.2%), 2 in 164 (43.0%), 3 in 94 (24.7%), 4 in 21 (5.5%), and 5 in 2 (0.5%). Interobserver agreement was 0.99 for presence and 0.43 for number of sections of pseudoradial tear. Arthroscopies were performed in 96 patients and none of the pseudoradial tears were proven as true radial tears on arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: Pseudoradial tears are frequently seen in AH to body of MM on coronal MR images and may be another pitfall that a radiologist needs to be aware of and be able to differentiate from true radial tear.
