Perineal urethrostomy plus secondary urethroplasty for ultralong urethral stricture: clinical outcomes and influence on the patient's quality of life.
- Author:
Yong-Quan WANG
1
;
Heng ZHANG
;
Wen-Hao SHEN
;
Long-Kun LI
;
Wei-Bing LI
;
En-Qing XIONG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ostomy; Perineum; surgery; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Urethral Stricture; surgery; Urologic Surgical Procedures; methods; Young Adult
- From: National Journal of Andrology 2012;18(4):291-295
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate the outcomes of perineal urethrostomy plus secondary urethroplasty for ultralong urethral stricture and assess its influence on the patient's quality of life.
METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed 54 cases of ultralong urethral stricture treated by perineal urethrostomy from 2000 to 2010. The mean age of the patients was 40 years, and the average length of stricture was 6.5 cm. We evaluated the patients'quality of life by questionnaire investigation and the clinical outcomes based on IPSS, Qmax, the necessity of urethral dilation and satisfaction of the patients.
RESULTSThe mean Qmax of the 54 patients was (14.0 +/- 4.7) ml/min. Of the 34 cases that underwent secondary urethroplasty, 22 (64.7%) achieved a mean Qmax of (12.0 +/- 3.5) ml/min, 8 (23.5%) needed regular urethral dilatation and 4 (11.8%) received internal urethrotomy because of restenosis. IPSS scores were 5.4 +/- 2.1 and 8.5 +/- 5.8 after perineal urethrostomy and secondary urethroplasty, respectively. Fifty of the total number of patients (92.6%) were satisfied with the results of perineal urethrostomy, and 22 of the 34 (64.7%) with the results of secondary urethroplasty.
CONCLUSIONPerineal urethrostomy plus secondary urethroplasty is safe and effective for ultralong urethral stricture, and affects very little the patient's quality of life.
