Differences in cognitive profiles between traumatic brain injury and stroke: A comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination.
- Author:
Hao ZHANG
1
;
Xiao-Nian ZHANG
;
Hui-Li ZHANG
;
Liang HUANG
;
Qian-Qian CHI
;
Xin ZHANG
;
Xiao-Ping YUN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; psychology; Cognitive Dysfunction; etiology; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Stroke; psychology
- From: Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2016;19(5):271-274
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSETo investigate the profiles of cognitive impairment through Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in patients with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI) or stroke and to evaluate the sensitivity of the two scales in patients with TBI.
METHODSIn this cohort study, a total of 230 patients were evaluated, including TBI group (n = 103) and stroke group (n = 127). The cognitive functions of two groups were evaluated by designated specialists using MoCA (Beijing version) and MMSE (Chinese version).
RESULTSComparedwith the patientswith stroke, the patientswith TBI received significantly lower score in orientation subtest and recall subtest in both tests.MoCA abnormal rates in the TBI group and stroke group were 94.17% and 86.61% respectively,whileMMSE abnormal rateswere 69.90% and 57.48%, respectively. In the TBI group, 87.10% patientswith normalMMSE score had abnormalMoCA score and in the stroke group, about 70.37% patients with normal MMSE score had abnormal MoCA score. The diagnostic consistency of two scales in the TBI group and the stroke group were 72% and 69%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONIn our rehabilitation center, patients with TBI may have more extensive and severe cognitive impairments than patients with stroke, prominently in orientation and recall domain. In screening post- TBI cognitive impairment, MoCA tends to be more sensitive than MMSE.