A survey of local preclinical and clinical medical students' attitudes towards radiology.
- Author:
Lynette L S TEO
1
;
Sudhakar K VENKATESH
;
Poh Sun GOH
;
Vincent F H CHONG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Attitude of Health Personnel; Clinical Clerkship; Clinical Competence; statistics & numerical data; Curriculum; Education, Medical, Undergraduate; Educational Measurement; Educational Status; Health Care Surveys; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Radiology; education; Schools, Medical; statistics & numerical data; Singapore; Students, Medical; psychology; statistics & numerical data; Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2010;39(9):692-694
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTIONThis study compares the attitudes between preclinical and clinical medical students towards radiology, following the introduction of a new radiology curriculum for 1st year students.
MATERIALS AND METHODSRevision of the 1st year medical school curriculum for the academic year of 2008/9 with the inclusion of 13 one-hour formal radiology lectures integrated with each body system was done in an undergraduate Southeast Asian medical school. In the old curriculum, 1st and 2nd year medical students are not exposed to radiology. They received limited radiology teaching in their 3rd and 5th years with 2 one-hour lectures as part of their medicine and surgery rotations. In the 4th year, they have a one week non-examinable posting in radiology. A survey was administered to preclinical (new curriculum) and clinical (old curriculum) students. Survey responses were tabulated and attitudes between preclinical and clinical students were compared.
RESULTSMore than half of the preclinical students (155 out of 270 students, 59%) and 90 out of 720 clinical students (12.5%) responded. Students exposed to the new curriculum had attended one or two dedicated radiology lectures and were considering radiology as a clinical elective. Both groups of students did not feel familiar with radiology as with other specialties, were not considering radiology as a career, but felt that radiology was interesting and important to the overall practice of medicine.
CONCLUSIONSExposure of 1st year students to radiology increases their interest in the subject. Further intervention, fi ne-tuning of the curriculum and follow-up surveys will be carried out to see if this interest persists throughout their clinical years.