Effects of portaazygous disconnection, portocaval shunt and selective shunts on experimental rat liver cirrhosis.
- Author:
Xin-Bao XU
1
;
Jing-Xiu CAI
;
Jia-Hong DONG
;
Zhen-Ping HE
;
Bei-Li HAN
;
Xi-Sheng LENG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Animals; Hypertension, Portal; etiology; surgery; Liver Cirrhosis, Experimental; complications; surgery; Portacaval Shunt, Surgical; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical; methods; Rats; Rats, Wistar
- From: Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2005;13(2):113-116
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effects of portaazygous disconnection (PAD), portacaval shunt (PCS) and distal splenocaval shunt (DSCS) on the portosytemic shunting (PSS), hepatic function (HF), hepatic mitochondrial respiratory function (HMRF), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and arterial ketone body ratio (KBR) in order to provide a sound basis for selecting suitable operations for patients.
METHODSUsing a cirrhotic portal hypertensive model induced by CCl4/ethanol in Wistar rats, the PSS, HF, HMRF, OGTT and KBR were determined three weeks after PCS, DSCS and PAD.
RESULTSIt was revealed that: (1) In the cirrhotic portal hypertension rats, the PSS increased significantly, HMRF and hepatic reserve function (HRF) decreased significantly when compared with the control rats. (2) At the time of first postoperative week, the mean blood glucose value in the 120-minute OGTT in each PAD, PCS and DSCS groups had significant differences compared with the cirrhotic control group. But during the second and third postoperative weeks, the mean blood glucose values in the 120-minute OGTT in both PAD and DSCS groups had no significant differences compared with the cirrhotic control group except for the PCS group. The values of KBR in the three operative groups decreased significantly compared with the cirrhotic control group during the two postoperative weeks. In the third postoperative week, only the values of KBR in the PCS group had a significant difference compared with the cirrhotic control group. (3) After PCS, the PSS was further increased; HF and HMRF were significantly decreased. Little improvement was found in the third postoperative week. (4) After DSCS and PAD, the above mentioned indices were less influenced, and they were restored more quickly than those in the PCS group.
CONCLUSIONWe found that PAD and DSCS are more desirable than PCS.